On 12/17/2013 10:06 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Just piping in on this one point. POST is perfectly acceptable here, > and is not in conflict with the DAV spec in the least. Just because we > add a new route for locking/unlocked multiple paths (via POST) doesn't > mean we'll stop supporting the DAV LOCK/UNLOCK one-path-at-a-time route. > That's all the compatibility -- with old Subversion clients and generic > WebDAV clients alike -- that we need to fuss with.
By the way, I have no fewer than *six* patches with various stages of aborted attempts at this approach for this very problem. :-(
