On 17.11.2013 21:08, Gabriela Gibson wrote: > Thank you Ivan, > > I was blithely assuming that because I was removing trivial changes I > introduced to the branch, that no-one would track them :) Also I was > trying to avoid writing trivial things for people to read. > > The log message is fixed now. > > Now I'm curious -- what tools do people use to revise patches that allow > them to instantly spot (seemingly) minor additions?
Do you mean "revise patches" or "review commits"? If it's the latter, the fact that the list of affected files in the log message and the automatically generated list of changes in the commit mail are different is an obvious hint that something was either left out of the log message, or inadvertently committed. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco // Non-Stop Data e. br...@wandisco.com
