Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> writes: > Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> writes: > >> On 18.10.2013 23:13, Branko Čibej wrote: >>> Can someone explain what the purpose of the save_merged flag in the >>> conflict result struct is? It's used once in our code, but as far as I >>> can see, the resulting .edited file isn't actually by the code anywhere. >> >> "Isn't actually *used by* the code anywhere" > > I'm not sure what effect it has but I see it set by the client in: > > subversion/svn/conflict-callbacks.c:handle_text_conflict > > and used by the library in: > > subversion/libsvn_wc/conflicts.c:resolve_text_conflict
The log message is: r871101 | glasser | 2008-05-05 16:22:04 +0100 (Mon, 05 May 2008) | 28 lines At the conflict resolution prompt, if the user plays with the merged file (by choosing (e)dit or (l)aunch) and then chooses one of the resolution options that ignores the merged file ([mt][cf]), save a copy of the merged file as "foo.edited". This does not affect --accept. So it's saving a copy of a file that the user has edited? -- Philip