Patrick Sawyer <patrick.saw...@wandisco.com> wrote: > Just so I can update the customer what is the consensus on this > improvement and will this be raised into your issue tracker?
Hi Patrick. As you noted in your original post below, it's already in our issue tracker. The issue contains links to an email thread where a bit of discussion and a tentative patch were made earlier, presumably unresolved / unfinished. I suppose the consensus is that it's an enhancement request that's perceived to be of non-zero utility (enough that someone bothered to enter an issue requesting it and nobody has marked it "won't fix") but has not been discussed much and has not made it onto anyone's radar recently. If you or your customer find it of greater importance, perhaps explaining why it's important would help to revive it or help us to set its priority appropriately? - Julian > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Patrick Sawyer wrote: >> [...] do we have any discussion on this point? Would the ability to >> ignore properties be useful? >> >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Patrick Sawyer wrote: >> It may be useful to provide the option to ignore properties when performing >> an svn log. >>> >>> This has been referred to in a previous post: >>> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3690
