> > +1, except I'd condense --diff-all and --show-all-paths to a single > > additional option named, I dunno, --full-revision. </bikeshed>
[Julian Foad] > My latest thought in that area is like I listed above except omitting > the --diff-all option entirely -- after all, nobody has requested it > and it doesn't seem especially useful to me. Well, "nobody has requested it" is meaningless, since they already have it today, with '--diff'. But... either way. I note that it's also what 'git diff' does (annoying, but 'git diff .' is a simple workaround). > Obviously we need the --show-all-paths option for back-compat. (If > your suggestion of '--full-revision' meant 'show all paths and show > all diffs', then that would not be suitable for back-compat, would > it, because what we need is show all paths but no diffs.) No, I meant '--diff --full-revision' or '--show-paths --full-revision'. In fact I'd shorten --show-paths to --paths, to match --diff. And --full-revision could perhaps be shorter as well. Peter
