On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 06:32:13PM +0200, Lieven Govaerts wrote: >> This 204 response is not a problem, there's a special case for >> Content-Length == 0 && code == 204 in serf (response_buckets.c). > > Looking at the serf (1.2.1) code, that logic isn't right, you need to > follow the precedence in the RFC, particularly that [23]04 is dominant > over C-L/T-E in determining message length. (I don't know whether that > bug could manifest exactly as described here.) > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-4.4
You're right, that code was not completely aligned with RFC2616. Fixed on serf trunk in r2011 and r2012. That can't explain this particular issue though, the 204 response had Content-Length 0, so serf should have done the right thing. It was the "201 Created" with Content-Length 349 that lacked the message body. Mark: is this still an open issue? > Regards, Joe thanks, Lieven
