On 27.06.2013 19:42, Julian Foad wrote: > For the record, to make it easier to understand our current position in > retrospect, I'll try to summarize our findings about the 'rotate' operation > so far. > > We started with a requirement: > > * Represent with 'true moves' any combination of moves that can already be > represented using the copy-and-delete model in Ev1.
Put that way, the requirement is obviously silly since move is /not/ "copy and delete". It's reasonable to presume that there may be restrictions to true moves that do not apply to the copy+delete model (an obvious example being that you can't commit only half a move). -- Brane -- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco // Non-Stop Data e. br...@wandisco.com
