On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> wrote: > In that post I thought that --show-copies-as-adds (svn) was the > reverse from --diff-copy-from (svnlook), but I observed that it didn't > really work: > > "However, I just > quickly tested an 'svn diff -c XXX' of some revision which has a move, > and it always shows the moved file in full as a delete and an add, no > matter if I use --show-copies-as-adds or not. So it seems that > detecting copies with their sources is broken in 'svn diff'. " > > Funny to read that back now :-).
I even vaguely remember that thread. It is indeed funny how things come back around.
