Ivan Zhakov wrote: > Julian Foad wrote: >>>>> Log: >>>>> * subversion/svn/svn.c >>>>> (svn_cl__check_cancel): Validate passed cancel baton for >>>>> better test coverage. [...] >> The code looks good but I don't understand the log message. We >> don't normally describe input validation as adding better "test >> coverage". Did you have something more specific in mind? What >> problem on dev@ is this related to? >> > It's not input validation. We were passing invalid cancel baton and > found this issue only in TortoiseSVN. See r1495850: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1495850 > http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-06/0543.shtml
Thanks for explaining. I have added this information to the log message. - Julian
