On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Mattias Engdegård <matti...@bredband.net> wrote: > 20 jun 2013 kl. 16.54 skrev Ivan Zhakov: > > >> It seems the code is missing #ifdef SVN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS_IS_OK . The >> attached patch should fix problem, but I'm not sure that this is right >> solution for the problem. > > > Assuming the hash function does not need to be portable (which appears > likely from a cursory look at the code), that fix is basically correct, if > you move out the assignment i=0 to right before the section you made > conditional. The following loop will complete the hash. > In other words, something like: > Yes, I missed "i = 0" assignment. Thanks for fixing.
Stefan, I think Mattias is faster and prefer this approach actually. -- Ivan Zhakov CTO | VisualSVN | http://www.visualsvn.com
