On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote: > On 02.06.2013 04:07, Ben Reser wrote: >> I was hoping someone else would weigh in here. But I guess not. >> >> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> You guys are over-thinking it. Simply state this format is ASF-wide >>> and be done with it. >> Okay but should we ask anyone before we go and start using something >> like application/vnd.apache.pubsub+json? Daniel seemed to think we >> shouldn't use the apache namespace without talking to operations.
Nah. As I mentioned elsewhere: these aren't created every day. I don't see any real need to coordinate this stuff. We could probably have a ASF-wide registration thingy somewhere. Maybe in the same directory where we records ICLAs, CCLAs, software grants, etc. >... >> Yes assuming they were defined when Subversion was under the >> Subversion Corporation. Interestingly they appear not to be >> registered (at least they aren't on the IANA list). > > Yup; at the time, I got the impression that registration was not in fact > strictly required; only useful. Right. >... > or even better, > > application/vnd.apache.vc-notify+json > > as the format of the notifications does not in fact imply any kind of > publish/subscribe architecture. You could create a server which clients Ooh. I like that one. +1 >... Cheers, -g
