On 10.05.2013 17:28, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 05:17:47PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 10.05.2013 16:32, Stefan Sperling wrote: >>> The STATUS file on 1.7.x contains a lot of entries. >>> There is one critical issue (the \n problem with FSFS) that I would >>> like to release a fix for ASAP. >>> >>> I'd be happy to drive the release process for 1.7.10, and would roll >>> a tarball next Thursday or Friday. This would leave about one week >>> for additional review and nominations. >>> >>> Any objections? >> I propose we get 1.8.0-rc out the door first. > I've already sent my sigs for 1.8.0-rc1 last week.
RC-1 was effectively vetoed by the svnserve threading problems which are being actively fixed now. We cannot release that tarball. > Are you worried that people will still be busy testing 1.8.0-rc1 > next week, so they won't have time to review STATUS on 1.7.x? > > And I don't see why we couldn't prepare two releases somewhat > concurrently. Not that I want people to hurry unnecessarily. > But it won't hurt to have a 1.7.10 tarball people could sign > if they wanted to, would it? It would be far better to let people concentrate on those fixes than to distract them with 1.7.10. There's no rush that I detect. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
