I think adding a check like that would be good. I just want to know what did everybody review ;)
Blair On Apr 24, 2013, at 6:06 AM, Daniel Shahaf <danie...@elego.de> wrote: > Should backport.pl attempt to catch such a situation? > > I'm inclined to say "No", since the entry should not have been moved > below the "Approved" header and given three +1 votes if it had a revnum > typo. (But it should be easy to inject an 'svn log -qvr | wc -l > 4' type > check, if people prefer that.) > > Philip Martin wrote on Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 09:02:14 +0100: >> Blair Zajac <bl...@orcaware.com> writes: >> >>> It looks like the wrong revision number was given in STATUS, as it's a >>> tomcat commit: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1471029 >> >> r1471028 is the revision that should have been proposed/voted/merged. >> >> -- >> Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: >> http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download >
