On 04/22/2013 01:22 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
>> I wonder, though:  isn't this rev-range support better situated in the RA
>> layer itself, extended up to the server?  I ask because IIRC, the fallback
>> implementation of svn_ra_get_repos_locations()
> 
> You too mean svn_ra_get_location_segments or svn_ra_get_locations I assume?

Yes, sorry.  I confess I was trying to dredge up the API name from memory.
It's svn_ra_get_location_segments() that I had in mind.  Sorry for the
confusion.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Enterprise Cloud Development

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to