On 04/17/2013 07:34 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: >> With 1.6 and 1.8 I get: >> >> $ svn up wc/some-file-that-does-not-exist >> At revision 3 >> >> With 1.7 I get: >> >> $ svn up wc/some-file-that-does-not-exist >> Updating 'wc/some-file-that-does-not-exist': >> At revision 3 >> >> Is it valid for these update to be successful? Should we be returning >> an error if the update target doesn't exist in the intial working copy >> and doesn't get added by the update? > > I'm not sure if we should make it an error, but a warning (=notification) > would be friendly.
+1. More than once I've mistakenly mis-issued an 'update' command and wished that Subversion had told me I'd made the mistake. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
