> Branko Čibej wrote: >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1465454 >>> Log: >>> * site/publish/docs/release-notes/1.8.html: Add a section about BDB >>> deprecation. >> >> Please review: >> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.8.html#bdb-deprecated
The opening paragraph sounds rather apologetic. It's good to indicate why we're doing this, but instead of the two sentences starting with "We simply do not have the resources...", shall we say briefly and positively: The Subversion developers have decided to deprecate the repository back-end based on Berkeley DB. The performance and architectural enhancements needed in the future will be delivered through the FSFS back-end. If we could link to somewhere where the rationale is discussed more fully, that would be a bonus. Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > Minor wording issue. Would > > " * Users ... and will receive as > much test coverage as it has[did?] in the past." > > be better than > > " * Users ... and will receive as > much test coverage as it has until now." > > ? +0. Sounds pretty much the same to me. - Julian
