On 03/20/2013 07:36 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 20.03.2013 12:04, Philip Martin wrote: >>> Note that I do /not/ propose that we similarly make -f an alias for >>> --non-interactive, because the latter is much less likely to be used by >>> command-line users than by scripts. >> I note that svnmucc already has a short option -n as an alias for >> --non-interactive. We are promoting svnmucc from "tools" to "bin" so I >> think we should make it consistent with our other clients and get rid of >> the anomalous -n. > > Agreed, especially given that -n is the common shorthand for --dry-run, > not for --non-interactive.
Yup, +1 for the same reason(s). -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
