On Mar 16, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> On 15.03.2013 17:57, Mark Phippard wrote: >> Just starting to do some JavaHL review as requested. >> >> There is a problem with how this change was made. The rules for changing a >> method are pretty much the same as they are for C. We cannot simply add >> new options to the existing method we need to add those in a "move2" method. > > Instead of renaming, e.g., move -> move2, I've been adding additional > overloads, to the same effect -- that the 1.7 interfaces remain unaffected. > > -- Brane > +1 I corrected myself to Philip but noticed I did not copy the list just as I hit Send. Mark
