On 22.02.2013 18:35, Greg Stein wrote: > > > On Feb 22, 2013 10:51 AM, "Ben Reser" <b...@reser.org > <mailto:b...@reser.org>> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Philip Martin > > <philip.mar...@wandisco.com <mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com>> wrote: > > > Did you mean an in-tree build rather than a static build? I don't > think > > > we support building serf in-tree. > > > > Indeed we do not support in-tree serf builds. Nor is it something > > that is likely to be easy to use, since serf is now using SCons for > > their build system. > > > > We should probably add a note before 1.8 release explaining this since > > you can't simply ./get_deps.sh to cover this dependency now like you > > could with neon. > > I'd prefer we remove all in-tree builds, except for the private > copy/build of sqlite. Building that way was a workaround for when our > dependencies where "new on the scene" and were not regularly available > as their own packages/install. >
But they're not, and a case in point is the as-yet-unreleased Serf 1.2, which 1.8 will depend on, and which isn't likely to get into any major releases within 6 months of the Subversion (or Serf) release. (And neither is SVN, fwiw). -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
