On 08.01.2013 11:24, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > (all as disjoint working copies, the sparse working copy feature > is/was a bit too obscure for me, so I didn't know about that. I just > checked out one after the other the things I need).
This is actually an argument for my point of view. :) Subversion provides a feature that solves all the cases you mentioned, including refactoring between different projects, yet you don't use it because it's "too obscure". Instead you expect another feature to be delayed because we currently do not know how to transactionally modify several working-copy databases at the same time. Why not make the effort to make sparse working copies less obscure instead? -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
