Ben Reser wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Peter Samuelson <pe...@p12n.org> wrote: >> I don't get why we would want 'propdel --force' at all. Either the >> "misspelled" property exists, or it doesn't. >> >> If the "misspelled" property exists, probably the user already >> noticed the typo, that's why they're deleting it! I see no need for >> --force here. >> >> If the "misspelled" property does not exist, I think the warning that >> the property does not exist is just as good as a warning that they >> misspelled it or forgot to use --force. > > +1
Hmm, that does sound sane when you put it like that. I dunno, I can't think straight. If it makes sense to two or three of you, sure, go for it. - Julian
