On 15.11.2012 14:20, Mark Phippard wrote: > I thought the latest results show that Serf uses less server CPU? So > why are we still discussing this aspect? I guess we can stil make > Serf better here, but it is already better than Neon if this is the > measuring stick. > > If mod_deflate is not used, then Serf uses considerably less CPU than > Neon but sends significantly more data. If mod_deflate is used, it > uses slightly more CPU than Neon does (without mod_deflate) and sends > significantly less data.
This is what I'd expect given HTTPv2 design. > My main concerns are areas where it may catch server admins unprepared: > > * Explosion in HTTP requests == explosion in log file sizes. Even > with good log rotation, companies that need to retain their logs will > require a lot more disk storage than they have in the past. Question: Can we somehow mark those GETs as "less interesting" so that they can be filtered out of a normal access.log for higher-granularity debugging? -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
