Greg Stein wrote on Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 19:01:25 -0500: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Philip Martin > <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> wrote: > >... > > Another concern is the increased server logging due to the large > > increase in the number of requests. A 1.8 server does better than older > > servers, about 50% fewer requests on checkout, but there is still a big > > increase over neon. No solution other than "it happens". > > You keep mentioning this. But what is the problem? "More logs" is too > subjective to quality as a concern/problem. > > In October, svn.apache.org generated about 900M of logs(*). Is that a > problem? I wouldn't think so. At that rate, a simple 1T drive could > hold over 83 years of logs. Are there installations busier than
How many years would those 1TB disks last for if all neon clients were converted to serf? > svn.a.o? Sure. Can they afford 1T drives? If they're running at that > rate, then you bet. > > Cheers, > -g > > (*) those logs are likely under-sized, as the majority of requests are > using neon and subkit rather than serf. adjust that 83 *years* > accordingly.
