On 05.11.2012 15:19, Paul Burba wrote: > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:40:41AM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote: >>> Guess I just do not see big benefit from using the existing property. >>> I am not vetoing the idea or anything, just do not see the big >>> improvement and the parsing/merging sounds complicated. >> I agree. Changing the way svn:ignore works introduces a risk >> of regressions without much benefit. > It probably goes without saying, but I'm with Mark and Stefan on this. > I don't see any advantage to piggybacking new inheritable ignore > behavior on the existing svn:ignore property. > > As for the property names, after much discussion on IRC > (http://colabti.org/irclogger/irclogger_log/svn-dev?date=2012-11-01#l185) > it appears we are in agreement on these changes: > > "svn:inheritable-auto-props" --> "svn:auto-props". > "svn:inheritable-ignores" --> "svn:global-ignores"
+1 from the peanut gallery. -- Brane
