On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 04:53:41PM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote: > Maybe we should default to this new behavior and *add* a quick exit on error > for whoever needs it.
That's what I've been arguing all along. I think the new behaviour should be the default. > I think the total report on which revisions are broken is more informational > than just the first error. And I don't like the '--force' for argument for > continuing. It's called --keep-going in the current iteration of the patch, not --force.
