He did indeed move it the wrong way and fixed it in r1403983.

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: danie...@apache.org [mailto:danie...@apache.org]
>> Sent: woensdag 31 oktober 2012 05:50
>> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: svn commit: r1403979 -
>> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c
>>
>> Author: danielsh
>> Date: Wed Oct 31 04:50:22 2012
>> New Revision: 1403979
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1403979&view=rev
>> Log:
>> No functional change.
>>
>> * subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c
>>   (do_io_file_wrapper_cleanup): Move earlier in the file so that it's next
>>     to a "Forward declarations" header.
>>
>> Modified:
>>     subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c
>>
>> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.
>> c?rev=1403979&r1=1403978&r2=1403979&view=diff
>> ==========================================================
>> ====================
>> --- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c (original)
>> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c Wed Oct 31 04:50:22 2012
>> @@ -2077,11 +2077,6 @@ svn_io_file_lock2(const char *lock_file,
>>
>
>>  /* Data consistency/coherency operations. */
>>
>> -static APR_INLINE svn_error_t *
>> -do_io_file_wrapper_cleanup(apr_file_t *file, apr_status_t status,
>> -                           const char *msg, const char *msg_no_name,
>> -                           apr_pool_t *pool);
>> -
>>  svn_error_t *svn_io_file_flush_to_disk(apr_file_t *file,
>>                                         apr_pool_t *pool)
>>  {
>> @@ -3726,6 +3721,10 @@ svn_io_dir_open(apr_dir_t **new_dir, con
>>  /* Forward declaration */
>>  static apr_status_t
>>  dir_is_empty(const char *dir, apr_pool_t *pool);
>> +static APR_INLINE svn_error_t *
>> +do_io_file_wrapper_cleanup(apr_file_t *file, apr_status_t status,
>> +                           const char *msg, const char *msg_no_name,
>> +                           apr_pool_t *pool);
>
> Just looking at this patch, isn't this moving it to further in the file?
> (Or is it just switching the order and do we see a different diff?)
>
> The log message would indicate that you moved the definition up.
>
>         Bert
>

Reply via email to