He did indeed move it the wrong way and fixed it in r1403983.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: danie...@apache.org [mailto:danie...@apache.org] >> Sent: woensdag 31 oktober 2012 05:50 >> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org >> Subject: svn commit: r1403979 - >> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c >> >> Author: danielsh >> Date: Wed Oct 31 04:50:22 2012 >> New Revision: 1403979 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1403979&view=rev >> Log: >> No functional change. >> >> * subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c >> (do_io_file_wrapper_cleanup): Move earlier in the file so that it's next >> to a "Forward declarations" header. >> >> Modified: >> subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c >> >> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io. >> c?rev=1403979&r1=1403978&r2=1403979&view=diff >> ========================================================== >> ==================== >> --- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c (original) >> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c Wed Oct 31 04:50:22 2012 >> @@ -2077,11 +2077,6 @@ svn_io_file_lock2(const char *lock_file, >> > >> /* Data consistency/coherency operations. */ >> >> -static APR_INLINE svn_error_t * >> -do_io_file_wrapper_cleanup(apr_file_t *file, apr_status_t status, >> - const char *msg, const char *msg_no_name, >> - apr_pool_t *pool); >> - >> svn_error_t *svn_io_file_flush_to_disk(apr_file_t *file, >> apr_pool_t *pool) >> { >> @@ -3726,6 +3721,10 @@ svn_io_dir_open(apr_dir_t **new_dir, con >> /* Forward declaration */ >> static apr_status_t >> dir_is_empty(const char *dir, apr_pool_t *pool); >> +static APR_INLINE svn_error_t * >> +do_io_file_wrapper_cleanup(apr_file_t *file, apr_status_t status, >> + const char *msg, const char *msg_no_name, >> + apr_pool_t *pool); > > Just looking at this patch, isn't this moving it to further in the file? > (Or is it just switching the order and do we see a different diff?) > > The log message would indicate that you moved the definition up. > > Bert >