On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Paul Burba <ptbu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:41 PM, <pbu...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> Author: pburba >>>> Date: Tue Oct 9 18:41:55 2012 >>>> New Revision: 1396184 >>>> >>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1396184&view=rev >>>> Log: >>>> On the auto-props-sdc branch: Rename the reserved property >>>> "svn:config:auto-props" to svn:iprop-auto-props". >>>> >>>> First and foremost this is to address cmpilato's concerns, see >>>> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-10/0097.shtml But it is also a bit of >>>> bike-shedding; since the old name contained the word "config" it needlessly >>>> conflated itself with the config file which is home of the traditional >>>> auto-props. I think the new name makes it clearer that these auto-props >>>> are outside of the config file. >>> >>> I liked the use of "config" precisely because this property IS >>> somewhat connected to what is in that file. I am not against dropping >>> config, but if we do, then I would also drop iprop and just make the >>> property be svn:auto-props > > I shy away from 'svn:auto-props' because eventually we'll have some > sort of ignores-server-dictated-config via inheritable props and > svn:ignore is already taken, so we probably want some common prefix to > this class of inheritable properties.
I was going to mention that, but remembering the name of the setting in config I assumed we would just name the new property svn:global-ignores -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/
