On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:26 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> wrote:

> My understanding was that the namespaces were kinda treated like opaque
> strings, so "nesting" isn't really even interesting from an XML parser
> standpoint so much as mere "uniqueness" is.
>
> Top answer here (plus the "nit" comment thereupon) seems to confirm as much:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/588919/what-is-the-practice-for-nesting-xml-namespaces

I notice you have not backed out your change, so what is the net
result of all of this?

I am assuming you committed your patch because you did not see a
problem.  Is it just that expat does not validate the namespace but
this could be a problem with some other XML parser?

Given that, what does it mean for your change, and possibly Paul's
branch?  Should you go back to using the dash?

-- 
Thanks

Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to