Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> writes: > On 18.09.2012 12:05, Philip Martin wrote: >> s...@apache.org writes: >> >>> Author: stsp >>> Date: Mon Sep 17 16:29:25 2012 >>> New Revision: 1386696 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1386696&view=rev >>> Log: >>> * configure.ac: Don't raise a fatal error if --with-gnome-kerying was passed >>> but the necessary things can't be found. Just print a warning and move on >>> without compiling GNOME Kerying support. >> Is that sensible behaviour? I think it's a bit odd to continue without >> gnome keyring support if the user explicity requested it. > > We've always done that for Apache module support.
That sounds like the wrong behaviour as well. By default we should build as many stable features as possible. If I pass an explict option to enable/disable a feature that should be a hard requirement. -- Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads: http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
