On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 05:21:53PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote: > (I don't see how it can corrupt your working copy. It can make a local change > unnoticed, but I wouldn't call that corrupted) > > Bert
I just meant to say that the db state is inconsistent with the expected state if this bug triggers. If that is not corruption, then we can label it "inconsistency" or whatever.
