On 2012-06-19 01:29:18 -0400, Greg Stein wrote: > In 1.6, we erroneously used the containing directory's revision for the > file in certain cases. 1.7 is correct: the file is not changed until r4. > Maybe the directory has, but that is independent of the file.
But in this case, is it normal that r3 is still in the log of the file? For instance, even though r3 is not a changed rev of the file, "svn log -v file" gives: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r4 | vinc17 | 2012-06-19 09:36:50 +0200 (Tue, 19 Jun 2012) | 1 line Changed paths: D /dir2/file A /file (from /dir2/file:3) mv dir2/file . ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r3 | vinc17 | 2012-06-19 09:36:47 +0200 (Tue, 19 Jun 2012) | 1 line Changed paths: D /dir1 A /dir2 (from /dir1:2) mv dir1 dir2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r2 | vinc17 | 2012-06-19 09:36:44 +0200 (Tue, 19 Jun 2012) | 1 line Changed paths: A /dir1/file add dir1/file ------------------------------------------------------------------------ IMHO, this can be useful information in the log history, but the difference between what is regarded as a "changed rev" of a file and the file history that appears in the log doesn't seem to be documented. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
