Hi all, Yesterday, I discovered an inconsistency in our log API. svn_revnum_t is a long while the "limit" parameter is an int.
Since we have a practical limit of 2^31 on our revision numbers and because int is (at least) 32 bits on all our targets, switching the limit parameter to long is a pretty much a mere formality. The fix ripples through all ra layers and such blowing the patch up to more then 700 lines. So, I think it is simply not worth it. -- Stefan^2.
