Hi, Philip, Von: MARTIN PHILIP [codematt...@ntlworld.com] >Markus Schaber <m.scha...@3s-software.com> writes: > >>> One thing that is still not quite right is that the final state of >>> the file is unmodified but NODES.last_mod_time is not set. It's not >>> caused by your patch but ideally we would update last_mod_time. >> >> Is there anything I can do to set it at that place? Or should that be >> cared of at a different place?
> I think you add some sort of workqueue item to the work_items list. Do you think it is sufficient to just do the same as in the case above (when the existing file is unmodified)? I think this is not as efficient as the file is overridden without any need, but it might set the timestamps. What Do you think? Thanks, Markus -- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.com ________________________________________ Von: MARTIN PHILIP [codematt...@ntlworld.com]" im Auftrag von "Philip Martin [philip.mar...@wandisco.com] Gesendet: Montag, 11. Juni 2012 16:43 Bis: Markus Schaber Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [PATCH]: Fix issue #4128
