On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Ivan Zhakov <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm still in favor to include properties in update REPORT (Mike's > approach). PROPFINDs are not cached by proxies and working copy. There > are relatively small, so there is no real benefit to fetch them using > separate request.
If you do that, then you have to store all of the properties in-memory for the entire checkout or serialize on to disk or something similar...ugh. I'd also be curious how much extra time it takes to include the properties in the REPORT response - it's not going to be free and may not even be cheap. =( -- justin
