Moe, Mark wrote on Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:33:36 -0500: > Yes, I tried it and it was very effective! See below: > > 1.6.17 1.7.4 1.7.4-patched > NFS benchmark* 1534s 4074s 572s > Local benchmark* 365s 162s 118s > NFS svn co 29s 163s 18s > Local svn co 4s 4s 3s > > Are there any downsides to this patch? It sounds like the only downside is a > delay to simultaneous read operations for the same working-copy. Those > operations are very rare for compared to the huge gains in NFS working-copy > performance. > > Thanks for figuring out this patch!
What patch are you talking about? I don't recall seeing a patch on list
