Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > Since symmetric merge has more freedom in > choosing base and merge order, the meaning > of "base", "mine", "theirs" etc. might become > ambiguous if they are being derived automatically > from the diff3 being executed. I simply want > to note that we might need to explicitly tell > the wc which input has which meaning for a > given merge step.
Yes, a fair point that the terms might become more ambiguous and inconsistent than they already are, so we may need to be more explicit. - Julian
