On 20.04.2012 23:45, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > We could even be more permissive: as long as the merge > does not cross "switch boundaries" (switched / non- > switched or switched to different URL) as may allow > the merge. > > This could be a somewhat typical use-case for people > using switched WCs. I would expect that these users > want to merge into those sub-trees just like they > would also 'svn up' them.
Doesn't merging in a switched subtree almost by definition imply creating subtree mergeinfo? I was under the impression that we wanted to more or less forbid such merges at some point in the future. -- Brane
