> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhuij...@apache.org [mailto:rhuij...@apache.org]
> Sent: maandag 16 april 2012 0:23
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1326433 - /subversion/trunk/build.conf
>
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Sun Apr 15 22:23:11 2012
> New Revision: 1326433
This fixes the
[[
Running tests in named_atomic-test.exe [18/87]Don't know what to do about
named_atomic-test.exe
]]
The buildbots got to:
[[
START: named_atomic-test.exe
PASS: named_atomic-test.exe 1: basic r/w access to a single atomic
PASS: named_atomic-test.exe 2: atomics must be 64 bits
PASS: named_atomic-test.exe 3: basic r/w access to multiple atomics
PASS: named_atomic-test.exe 4: use different namespaces
..\..\..\subversion\tests\libsvn_subr\named_atomic-test.c:560: (apr_err=720002)
..\..\..\subversion\tests\libsvn_subr\named_atomic-test.c:292: (apr_err=720002)
..\..\..\subversion\tests\libsvn_subr\named_atomic-test.c:268: (apr_err=720002)
..\..\..\subversion\tests\libsvn_subr\named_atomic-test.c:236: (apr_err=720002)
..\..\..\subversion\libsvn_subr\io.c:2594: (apr_err=720002)
svn_tests: E720002: Can't start process 'named_atomic-proc-test': The system
cannot find the file specified.
FAIL: named_atomic-test.exe 5: multithreaded access to atomics
..\..\..\subversion\tests\libsvn_subr\named_atomic-test.c:572: (apr_err=720002)
..\..\..\subversion\tests\libsvn_subr\named_atomic-test.c:292: (apr_err=720002)
..\..\..\subversion\tests\libsvn_subr\named_atomic-test.c:268: (apr_err=720002)
..\..\..\subversion\tests\libsvn_subr\named_atomic-test.c:236: (apr_err=720002)
..\..\..\subversion\libsvn_subr\io.c:2594: (apr_err=720002)
svn_tests: E720002: Can't start process 'named_atomic-proc-test': The system
cannot find the file specified.
FAIL: named_atomic-test.exe 6: multi-process access to atomics
END: named_atomic-test.exe
ELAPSED: named_atomic-test.exe 0:00:00.015000
]]
On my dev machine (Visual Studio 2010) I get a segfault in one of the earlier
tests, which just makes the tests get stuck waiting for a lock later on. (This
might be because the local segfault handler doesn't call unlock).
Both the Visual Studio 2008 and 2010 build fall in the fallback / default
implementation build of svn_named_atomic.c.
Bert
