Julian Foad wrote on Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 21:11:55 +0100: > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > Would having an explicit > > > > Skipped duplicated target 'foo' > > > > notification address your concern? > > It would mitigate the negative consequences. At least the user would then > know they'd made a mistake. Still lacking any positive justification, so > -0.25 :-) >
The positive justification was that if we interpret 'svn add foo bar' as 'add foo and bar', we might want to define the semantics as a set --- in which case erroring out on 'svn add foo foo' is wrong. Anyway, I won't pursue it. > - Julian > > > > Julian Foad wrote on Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 15:47:34 +0100: > >> In the issue, you give the example "$svn add f* *o", and then > >> claim svn should eliminate duplicate args for you. But why > >> should it? > [...] > >> In short, -0.5.
