Philip Martin <phi...@codematters.co.uk> writes:
> Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> writes:
>
>> Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hyrum K Wright <hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Agreed that the stack trace is important here. Do you know in which
>>>> revision it disappeared?
>>>
>>> When I sync'd the branch with the trunk :-P
>>>
>>> I'll have a look.
>>
>> r1297676 produces a Python stack trace, r1297712 does not.
>
> Ooops! r1297676 is just an error in the testsuite, not a stack trace
> for a failing test.
So it's really r1297661 that produces a Python stack trace:
svn: warning: W160040: No lock on path '/iota' in filesystem
'/home/pm/sw/subversion/obj2/subversion/tests/cmdline/svn-test-work/repositories/lock_tests-8/db'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/pm/sw/subversion/src2/subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/main.py",
line 1323, in run
rc = self.pred.run(sandbox)
File
"/home/pm/sw/subversion/src2/subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/testcase.py",
line 176, in run
return self.func(sandbox)
File "../../../../src2/subversion/tests/cmdline/lock_tests.py", line 338, in
handle_defunct_lock
file_path_b)
r1297676 doesn't run properly and r1297712 has no stack trace.
--
Philip
