Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> writes: > Geez. Be smart, Philip. Obviously, that quoted content is dumb. I'm talking > about format. Specifically not following the basic rule of "one line > summary. One blank line. Details." Julian's change is missing the blank > lines, which many tools parse.
That's what I don't understand. Are we expecting people to use tools to parse these docstrings? If we have to repeat default parameters in the docstring it it something we can get wrong, if we don't repeat them they can't be wrong. What do we gain? -- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.com
