Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> writes: > Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> writes: > >> Please explain again, why do we need the revved _ensure2 at all? Can you >> think of any possible way that even marginally sane code would break if >> we just fixed the docs and behaviour of _ensure? > > I was thinking the same. What would break is somebody reading the new > docs and writing code that fails when linked against existing > svn_stringbuf_ensure.
A patch from trunk backported to an old branch, say. -- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.com
