On 12 feb 2012, at 16:59, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 04:47:45PM +0100, Thomas Åkesson wrote: >> Would it make sense to formalize the different approaches into a >> couple of RFCs attempting to summarize the respective implications of >> each approach? I could try to write one up for the "Non-normalizing >> approach". > > Detailed design specs and proposals are always welcome and useful. > Of course, we cannot tell in advance whether they will be implemented. > But the more concrete and detailed information we have about different > solutions and trade-offs, the more likely it is that this problem will > be resolved at some point.
I have almost completed a first iteration of a more detailed spec for the proposal. I have difficulty with the details of wc-ng since I have no "under the hood" knowledge. I hope someone is willing to help out with wc-ng insight. I will happily iterate the proposal to capture that. Will post the proposal tomorrow... ok today (Monday). /Thomas Å.
