DoS? With the old code: the client died. With the new code: the client dies. No change that I'm aware of, other than a nicer error message.
It seems the justification would be, "nicer error message" rather than anything about DoS. Cheers, -g On Feb 9, 2012 6:46 PM, <danie...@apache.org> wrote: > Author: danielsh > Date: Thu Feb 9 23:46:06 2012 > New Revision: 1242608 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1242608&view=rev > Log: > Nominate r1242607. > > Modified: > subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS > > Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1242608&r1=1242607&r2=1242608&view=diff > > ============================================================================== > --- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original) > +++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Thu Feb 9 23:46:06 2012 > @@ -85,6 +85,13 @@ Candidate changes: > Votes: > +1: philip > > + * r1242607 > + Convert ra_serf assertions to errors. > + Justification: > + Malicious server can DoS clients. > + Votes: > + +1: danielsh > + > Veto-blocked changes: > ===================== > > > >
