On 02/04/2012 01:10 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Julian Foad <julianf...@btopenworld.com> 
> wrote:
>> I'm not quite sure I fully follow you at the moment, so I'm not sure if my 
>> reply is on the right track at all, but it's really sounding like you're up 
>> against a mis-match of responsibilities between Ev1 which sends deltas 
>> according to particular rules and Ev2 which is designed to be wrapped inside 
>> a driver-receiver pairing that knows privately how to deltify and recover to 
>> full text in any way it wants to.  The shims obviously need to convert from 
>> the Ev2 deltification back (via a full text intermediary if necessary) to 
>> what Ev1 expects.
> 
> What's driving this discussion is this:  Up until this point in the
> Ev2 shims we've been supplying a NULL base checksum for apply
> textdelta, which the receivers have dutifully ignored.  However, when
> the Ev2 shims attempt to be honest about the fact that they are using
> the empty stream for the text base, the receivers start complaining,
> because that's not what they expected---even though the end result is
> the same.  In essence, all these checks are returning false positives,
> which is extremely unpleasant.
> 
> I don't know that there is an easy way around this, since by the time
> we're translated from Ev2->delta-editor, we don't have the original
> text base, or its checksum, available to us.  We have the full text,
> which is the reason the new text base is the empty stream: it's the
> only one we need.
> 
> Does that make any sense?

Yeah, sounds like we're in a tough spot here.  The checksums in Ev1 exist
only as sanity checks -- they definitely are NOT the primary selection
mechanism for the editor implementation's base text.

I assume we still have a valid checksum to pass to close_file() (the
checksum of the post-edit fulltext for that file), right?  It's just the
pre-edit base checksum that's the problem?

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to