On 01.02.2012 20:34, Greg Stein wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 07:57, Julian Foad <julianf...@btopenworld.com> wrote: >> Greg Stein wrote: >> >>> Oh. And that is an interesting point. We need server-side processing >>> of a commit plan. Maybe the plan code goes down into libsvn_subr so >>> both sides can create/consume/process the plans. [...] >> That's what libsvn_delta's for, no? > Oh. Yeah, I guess it could go in there, where libsvn_delta is "diff > code, and describing and making changes to trees". Something like > that. And a commit plan falls into that.
I thought libsvn_delta was strictly contextless binary deltas ... xdelta reimplemented, more or less. We even have a separate libsvn_diff. Clearly libsvn_subr is a catch-all, but tree walking code hardly fits in there. If the delta editors are currently client-side, and we suddenly need server-side code, too ... maybe a new library is in order? -- Brane
