On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 14:50, <cmpil...@apache.org> wrote: > Author: cmpilato > Date: Fri Jan 6 19:50:30 2012 > New Revision: 1228371 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1228371&view=rev > Log: > Finish issue #4092 ("Add 'svnadmin unlock' subcommand which provides a > lock token for unlock validation").
The requirement to specify a username/token seems a bit silly. If you have access to svnadmin, then you can just 'svnadmin lslocks' and feed that information into the command. I would recommend simplifying the command to just require the path. This is the *administrator* that you're talking about. The double-checks for a username/token are a bit silly for the admin. Cheers, -g