s...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 14:41:21 -0000: > Author: stsp > Date: Fri Dec 23 14:41:20 2011 > New Revision: 1222693 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1222693&view=rev > Log: > * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c > (read_children_info): Now that the repos_id problem is better understood > (see issue #4087), simplify the associated error message. > > Modified: > subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c > > Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c?rev=1222693&r1=1222692&r2=1222693&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c (original) > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c Fri Dec 23 14:41:20 2011 > @@ -7325,28 +7325,10 @@ read_children_info(void *baton, > return svn_error_createf( > SVN_ERR_WC_DB_ERROR, NULL, > _("The node '%s' comes from unexpected repository " > + "'%s', expected '%s'; if this node is a file " > + "external using the correct URL in the external " > + "definition can fix the problem, see issue > #4087"), > + child_relpath, repos_root_url, last_repos_root_url);
That error documents our current understanding of the problem. Wouldn't it be better to instead link here, not to the issue tracker, but to a FAQ entry that (a) can document our then-current understanding of the problem, (b) would be worded in a user-facing rather than dev-facing way? > child->repos_root_url = repos_root_url; > child->repos_uuid = repos_uuid; > } > >
