On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Philip Martin
<philip.mar...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> We have had a few users report a weird error that looks like they are
>> getting an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException except that it appears that
>> it is coming out of the native code.  This happens during an update
>> operation.  I am going to paste some of the native code in here, in
>> case anyone sees anything in the array handling that looks wrong.  The
>> use of ++i instead of i++ looks odd to me, but I am not a C++
>> programmer and the general code patterns.
>
> ++i and i++ are equivalent in this case, and likely to be identical
> after optimisation.
>
>>
>>     const apr_array_header_t *array = targets.array(subPool);
>>     SVN_JNI_ERR(targets.error_occured(), NULL);
>>     SVN_JNI_ERR(svn_client_update4(&revs, array,
>>                                    revision.revision(),
>>                                    depth,
>>                                    depthIsSticky,
>>                                    ignoreExternals,
>>                                    allowUnverObstructions,
>>                                    TRUE /* adds_as_modification */,
>>                                    makeParents,
>>                                    ctx, subPool.getPool()),
>>                 NULL);
>>
>>     JNIEnv *env = JNIUtil::getEnv();
>>     jlongArray jrevs = env->NewLongArray(revs->nelts);
>>     if (JNIUtil::isJavaExceptionThrown())
>>         return NULL;
>>     jlong *jrevArray = env->GetLongArrayElements(jrevs, NULL);
>>     if (JNIUtil::isJavaExceptionThrown())
>>         return NULL;
>>     for (int i = 0; i < revs->nelts; ++i)
>>     {
>>         jlong rev = APR_ARRAY_IDX(revs, i, svn_revnum_t);
>>         jrevArray[i] = rev;
>>     }
>>     env->ReleaseLongArrayElements(jrevs, jrevArray, 0);
>
> Do we need to consider ReleaseLongArrayElements raising an exception?
>
> Everything else looks OK.
>
>>     return jrevs;


The Subclipse code always calls this API with an array of exactly one
path.  I only see two arrays in this code.  The list of paths to
update, and the return value for revisions.

Is there ever a scenario where passing a single path to the API should
return an array of 68ish revisions?  Our code only ever looks at the
first revision returned since our API wrapper only accepts a single
path.

Just trying to figure out how we might recreate it.

-- 
Thanks

Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to