On 12/20/2011 11:54 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> Instead of continuing to envision incremental improvements to the various >> backends, why don't we just >> blow the whole thing up and come up with a design which meets the needs of >> the "modern" Subversion >> user? This isn't the place to propose such a design, obviously, but I think >> this type of issue would be >> useful in the design of a future filesystem. >> > > What other needs would you like to see addressed?
Oh, wow. Floodgates opened. Rename tracking; performant revprop query capabilities; real FS ACLs (which follow their nodes); pluggable storage behind uniform business logic; better support for batch operations; line-based delta information caching (for blame); first class merge tracking support at the FS level; ... -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
